A furious Peter Windsor has said that it was "ludicrous" that Charles Leclerc was not handed a penalty after his incident with Max Verstappen at the Spanish Grand Prix. After the ninth race of the 2025 season, the main discussion was
about the incident between Verstappen and George Russell. However, before that collision, there was also a clash between Leclerc and Verstappen on the straight.
On the hard tyres, Verstappen had a big slide coming out of the final corner on the safety car restart, giving Leclerc the chance to overtake the Dutchman right at the restart down the start/finish straight.
However, during the overtake, Leclerc edged towards
Verstappen, causing the two to touch at an extremely high speed. After the race, Leclerc emphasised that it was his
intention to push Verstappen slightly back towards the outside.
Charles Leclerc and Max Verstappen side-by-side on the start/finish straight at the Spanish Grand Prix
Those words from the Monagasque driver only increased Windsor's disagreement with the stewards in Barcelona, believing it to be incomprehensible
that they did not intervene with that incident.
‘’If Charles now says it was him (who collided with Verstappen, ed.), then even more shame on the FIA for not doing something about it," the Australian said on his YouTube channel.
"The FIA are wrong in their assessment that both drivers
caused an unavoidable collision. That's wrong. They should be correcting that now and apologising, and they should be thinking about taking some action, because that is inexcusable to not intervene in an incident at such high
speed.’’
Why Leclerc wasn't penalised for the incident with Verstappen
The stewards, however, judged differently. After Leclerc and
Verstappen had been to the stewards, they ruled that neither of the two drivers was primarily at fault for the incident because the Red Bull driver had also
moved to the right during the incident.
"To say that Max moved over is
ludicrous, because he was the one losing momentum, he was on the left side of the track, and he was going slower than Charles," the former
F1 team and sponsorship manager said.
"Maybe he moved a fraction more to the centre of the road, where it was a little bit clean, I don't know. But Charles already had the pass. He was obviously going to be in front going into turn
1. Why did he need to be that close to Max, and why did he then also edge towards the left?
"I was astonished that it took the stewards so long to review that. That should have been the first thing that was reviewed, even before
the George incident, because it was a high-speed incident and it was incredibly, potentially dangerous," concluded Windsor.
This article was written in collaboration with Tim Kraaij